Papers by G P Shrivatsa Bhargav
Leveraging Abstract Meaning Representation for Knowledge Base Question Answering (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pavan Kapanipathi, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Srinivas Ravishankar, Salim Roukos, Alexander Gray, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Maria Chang, Cristina Cornelio, Saswati Dana, Achille Fokoue, Dinesh Garg, Alfio Gliozzo, Sairam Gurajada, Hima Karanam, Naweed Khan, Dinesh Khandelwal, Young-Suk Lee, Yunyao Li, Francois Luus, Ndivhuwo Makondo, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Tahira Naseem, Sumit Neelam, Lucian Popa, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Ryan Riegel, Gaetano Rossiello, Udit Sharma, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Mo Yu
| Challenge: | Existing approaches face challenges including complex question understanding and lack of large end-to-end training datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular knowledge base question answering system that leverages AMR parses for task-independent question understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves state-of-the-art performance on two prominent KBQA datasets based on DBpedia. |
Granite-Function Calling Model: Introducing Function Calling Abilities via Multi-task Learning of Granular Tasks (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Kinjal Basu, Mayank Agarwal, Sadhana Kumaravel, Matthew Stallone, Rameswar Panda, Yara Rizk, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Maxwell Crouse, Chulaka Gunasekara, Shajith Ikbal, Sachindra Joshi, Hima Karanam, Vineet Kumar, Asim Munawar, Sumit Neelam, Dinesh Raghu, Udit Sharma, Adriana Soria, Dheeraj Sreedhar, Praveen Venkateswaran, Merve Unuvar, David Cox, Salim Roukos, Luis Lastras, Pavan Kapanipathi
| Challenge: | Existing research explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as the backbone of agentic systems. |
| Approach: | They propose a model trained using a multi-task training approach on seven fundamental tasks encompassed in function calling that has better generalizability on multiple tasks across seven evaluation benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms more than 15 other models on out-of-domain datasets and ranks among the top on the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL). |
Zero-shot Entity Linking with Less Data (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Dinesh Khandelwal, Saswati Dana, Dinesh Garg, Pavan Kapanipathi, Salim Roukos, Alexander Gray, L Venkata Subramaniam
| Challenge: | Entity linking maps an entity mention in a natural language sentence to an entity in KB. |
| Approach: | They propose a neuro-symbolic, multi-task learning approach to bridge this gap by exploiting an auxiliary information about entity types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves significantly higher performance on four different benchmark datasets when trained with just 0.01%, 0.1%, or 1% of the training data. |
Span Selection Pre-training for Question Answering (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Michael Glass, Alfio Gliozzo, Rishav Chakravarti, Anthony Ferritto, Lin Pan, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Dinesh Garg, Avi Sil
| Challenge: | Pre-trained BERTs provide large gains across many language understanding tasks, achieving a new state-of-the-art (SOTA). |
| Approach: | They propose a new pre-training task inspired by reading comprehension to better align the pre- training from memorization to understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms BERT-BASE and BERT LARGE on a new dataset and improves answer prediction F1 by 4 points and supporting fact prediction F1. |
SYGMA: A System for Generalizable and Modular Question Answering Over Knowledge Bases (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Sumit Neelam, Udit Sharma, Hima Karanam, Shajith Ikbal, Pavan Kapanipathi, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Young-Suk Lee, Santosh Srivastava, Cezar Pendus, Saswati Dana, Dinesh Garg, Achille Fokoue, G P Shrivatsa Bhargav, Dinesh Khandelwal, Srinivas Ravishankar, Sairam Gurajada, Maria Chang, Rosario Uceda-Sosa, Salim Roukos, Alexander Gray, Guilherme Lima, Ryan Riegel, Francois Luus, L V Subramaniam
| Challenge: | Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) systems have limited generalizability across knowledge bases and multiple reasoning types. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular approach for KBQA that is built on a framework adaptable to multiple knowledge bases and reasoning types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is generalized across multiple knowledge bases and reasoning types. |